Home Cinema TWD: Daryl Dixon – The Book of Carol is a difficult season 2

TWD: Daryl Dixon – The Book of Carol is a difficult season 2

0
TWD: Daryl Dixon – The Book of Carol is a difficult season 2


The first season of The Walking Dead: Daryl Dixon was a hit with critics and viewers alike – despite its flaws. It was eventually The Walking Dead The franchise was created in North America and captured the way cultural differences create unique apocalyptic circumstances. And it was also essentially a set-up for the unsurprising return of Melissa McBride as Carol Peletier. McBride and Norman Reedus had sizzling emotional chemistry as platonic (or maybe not-so-platonic) survivors throughout The Walking Dead11 seasons ago, and the idea was that Daryl Dixon I wouldn’t bother with such dynamite.




Season 2 of Daryl Dixonsubtitle Carol’s Bookis a sentimental track for Daryl and Carol. As usual, their characters are given deep arcs bewitched by unimaginable grief and tumultuous love — but when their metaphorical plane into the sunset takes off, the remarkable supporting cast is left behind. The tragedy of a country with a history of fighting fascism falling to a modern autocratic movement is still present with hints of a religious twist, but fades over the course of the season’s six episodes. The culprit seems to be that the story was reimagined to incorporate Carol. To expedite her return to Daryl’s side, other elements had to be sacrificed. What made Season 1 promising and different from the previous one Walking Dead competitors is now collateral damage. A recurring theme of Carol’s Book is that everyone has a chance to start over, but the series is too stuck in the past The Walking Deadthe glory days to ensure an original future.



Daryl Dixon’s Season 2 Builds on Messiah Cautionary Tale

The Book of Carol plays its religious themes…safely

Creator and showrunner David Zabel has the tricky task of tying together two extremely separate plots: Carol’s journey to find Daryl and the conflict in France. Zabel does a great job of layering the two into a cohesive narrative, but Carol’s Book The film only scratches the surface of the political and personal context of the war. Yet it is enough. By the end of Season 1, the religious movement known as the Union of Hope was the clear frontrunner—while the Power of the Living, led by Madame Genet, was the nihilistic villain. Carol’s Book The Union of Hope storyline puts everyone on equal footing with a manipulated tale of faith. Laurent Carrier’s role as a messiah-in-the-making is less about hope this season than about the dangers of playing God. The Union of Hope storyline slowly builds to a panicked turmoil that debates belief versus evidence and warns of those pulling the strings behind the scenes.


This is fascinating and loaded material that Carol’s Book flirts with during the first four episodes. Joel de la Fuente delivers a terribly charismatic performance as Losang, the ambitious but tempered leader of the Union of Hope. His wealthy Genet antithesis is sharpened by Anne Charrier’s poignant performance and added depth to his character. A big improvement over last season is that everyone’s motivations are much more apparent. The middle players can be stuck in a situation they don’t agree with and the others will naturally change their minds, but Carol’s Book is never confused about the characters’ obligations.


However, Carol’s Book is stubbornly playing it safe with this messiah story. Laurent’s unusual birth was criticized in Season 1 – but only because the show didn’t confidently deliver on the bizarre plot. A story of this magnitude is not something The Walking Dead the universe is used to this, but that doesn’t mean it should never expand its focus. Carol’s Book is more confident, but remains passive about it. There is a reluctance to fully engage with a story about the dangers of religious fanaticism. Isabelle Carrier is a perfect gateway to this type of plot, but her presence in the series is frustrating.

Carol’s return has its ups and downs

Carol’s presence in season 2 has its pros and cons.

Carol Peletier (Melissa McBride) stands in front of a tent in The Walking Dead: Daryl Dixon


What made Clémence Poésy’s play of Isabelle so remarkable was that she was the most incisive character in Season 1. Being a professional thief turned nun is more exciting than a seedy man stuck in the “tough guy guard” trope. Poésy delivers one of the most moving performances of a single episode in Season 2, but she doesn’t have the same incisive material she had in Season 1. It’s hard to say this, but it’s because Carol’s Book does not allow two female characters to share the spotlight together.

There is almost nothing wrong with Carol’s story in this series. Zabel treats Carol like The Walking Dead Carol has shown grace and passionate depth. Carol’s conflicted friendship with a new character, Ash, puts her into a steady rhythm that forces her to confront an unresolved part of her past and her faltering moral code. But is it too much to ask that Isabelle, who also happens to be close to Daryl, not be demoted to raise another female character? Can’t Daryl have more than one friend who happens to be a woman, and can’t those women exist without Daryl as a backbone?


Supporting characters are generally not considered with Carol on board. Treating supporting characters as scenery pieces for the benefit of Reedus and McBride creates a flat narrative about two characters who have been established for nearly 15 years, while still being watchable. Reused rhythms are raging Carol’s Book when he ignores the opportunity to let secondary characters be active. Villain Stéphane Codron (played by Romain Levi) is more fleshed out than most, his personality shining through and rising above the stoic, oppressive soldier he was in Season 1. He’s a perfect example of how supporting characters are essential to a series, no matter how big or affectionate the protagonists are. Imagine The Walking Dead like about Rick Grimes, or Lost like the Jack Shephard story. It wouldn’t work, because the supporting characters add dimension in places the main characters can’t explore.


Daryl Dixon is still an ambitious love letter to apocalyptic France

Carol’s production book creates an invigorating atmosphere

Losang (Joel de la Fuente) among a crowd of people in The Walking Dead: Daryl Dixon

Continuation of season 1, Carol’s Book amazes with world building and production. The cinematography is more laid-back, but still beautiful. The advantage of shooting on location is that the series immerses viewers in this apocalyptic world in iconic French locations that weren’t previously explored in Season 1. The environments aren’t just a feast for the eyes, though. The filmmakers use them creatively to raise the stakes of the claustrophobic action scenes. And the action never slacks in this series; each fight scene incorporates different choreography and directing style to freshen up the human-on-human or human-on-zombie action.


One problem with a zombie franchise that has been around for a while is that the creatures that once served as THE the danger will no longer be dangerous. Daryl DixonThe show’s solution is to retool the walkers with new abilities and powers, and at times it’s ridiculous in terms of logic but visually cool. This season’s new walkers highlight the grotesquerie of untouched landscapes where nature takes over. It’s impressive to see new ways to make the environment an enemy in itself, bringing back the man-versus-nature themes that were so prevalent in the early seasons of The Walking Dead.


Daryl Dixon Season 2’s overall commitment to representing France as accurately as possible is admirable. Characters speak in French when English isn’t necessary, and there’s some amusing banter between characters from different European cultures. And when it feels like all French people support either religious fanaticism or fascism, Carol’s Book turns the tables to show that ordinary people are just trying to get by. It’s not perfect by any means. Some jokes about American and French culture and politics don’t translate well. One can’t help but think that to fully commit to a series based in France, it would have to have at least one French screenwriter.

Season 2 takes the good from The Walking Dead and the bad from the spin-offs

Daryl Dixon doesn’t know what kind of show he wants to be on


Carol’s Book actively tries to blend nostalgia and novelty, and it can be a trial to watch. The show is more personal and emotionally in tune, capitalizing on The Walking Deadhas long devoted himself to exploring different responses to grief. In this sense, Carol’s Book is a special addition to the franchise. But there’s this nagging feeling that Carol is being thrust into the series inorganically. McBride and Reedus are a rarity together, especially when they convey trauma and grief through shaken body language and tears. But it’s disconcerting when Carol is placed in a situation for the sake of convenience, or when she suddenly becomes an incredibly important person to people who shouldn’t care about her.

This form of erratic storytelling doesn’t give the series time to breathe and rushes this era of the series towards the finish line. The franchise has seen this series before; Carol’s Book follows the structure of Those who live Daryl and Carol are nearly perfect, but their main characters aren’t written with the same charismatic qualities as Rick and Michonne. Rest assured, after nearly 15 years of playing these characters, Reedus and McBride know the ins and outs of how to perfectly show off all of their facets. But Daryl and Carol work best as supporting characters. Daryl falls victim to these circumstances when all of the developments he made in Season 1 are subverted, putting him back where he started.


Carol’s Book supports the strengths of The Walking Dead but the weaknesses of spin-offs. The emotional brilliance of the series is a testament to The Walking Deads appreciation for characters rooted in a wild genre. This greatness is challenged by the rush to make his crossover characters the only ones worth following – something The Walking Dead: The Dead City struggles as well. By the end, it’s unclear what the story is supposed to be about. Everything that was good about Season 1 is gone, but maybe Carol’s Book is just a delicate transition period for Season 3 to reach its full potential. Yet the show seems determined to do the one thing it tried to avoid in Season 1: Americanize the Walking Dead European tour. At some point, the formula, no matter how much energy it contains, has to change. Otherwise, The Walking Dead: Daryl Dixon will end up taking Daryl’s “last man standing” mantra too literally.


The Walking Dead: Daryl Dixon – The Book of Carol will be released on September 29, 2024 on AMC and AMC+.

0:00
0:00