Horror fans have always had a romantic relationship with the remakes. More often than not, they miss the brand, but the reimpering in 2006 of the classic of Wes Craven in 1977 The hills have eyes Rivals on the original in several ways. Horror lovers often hold their favorites, making the effort to review a classic cult a risky business. For each remake of criticism, like John Carpenter The thing or David Cronenberg’s VolleyMany others leave viewers wonder why the original has been changed. When the remake of Alexandre Aja in 2006 of The hills have eyes was published, the expectations were low to measure until Wes Craven’s functionality in 1977. AJA’s point of view on Craven’s work managed to appease many fans not only by reworking the original with simple conspiracy changes, but but By offering a brighter and modern story.
In the mid -2000s, self -horror slashers from the 90s, as Shout And I know what you did last summer, fell from popularity in favor of more grainy and raw films. Films like Saw And Hostel made noise, inaugurating a new wave of shock and gore horror. The remake of The hills have eyes Arrived exactly at the right time, when horror and public films gave up towards more brutal representations. He looked at the most extreme visuals and scenarios that the public was waiting for. The era of meta-commentary and typical tropes no longer satisfied theater lovers. The era has become defined by horror films that have pushed the limits and tested, and The hills have eyes Certainly did that.
Wes Craven’s horror has set the tone for his legendary career
The hills have eyes followed in the last house on the left
For longtime horror fans, Wes Craven’s name has a huge weight. Original film by Craven, The hills have eyeshas cut his own place in the genre thanks to its raw intensity and its daring themes. For the era in which he was released, he was shocking and memorable, even if he showed the constraints of his budget. Like a large part of Craven’s work, he lingered in the minds of horror fans because he exploited the primordic fears and dared to push the limits when horror public played him more safe.
Alongside films like The Texas chain saw the massacre And The last house on the leftHe captured a decade of horror cinema which focused on challenge taboos and the presentation of human vulnerability. The hills have eyes presented horror as a battle between ordinary people and relentless violence.
The hills have eyes was an overview of the future of Craven because he would continue to reshape the history of horror throughout his career with films such as A nightmare on Elm Street And Shout. By introducing the character of Freddy Krueger in the 1980s, Craven redefined the supernatural possibilities that could be explored in the genre. In the 1990s, when the Slasher genre decreased, Craven invigorated it with the intelligent deconstruction of horror tropes as we see in Shout. Craven fingerprints helped shape the horror in three distinct decades, which very few filmmakers can claim.
In this spirit, The hills have eyes Stands as a pillar in his career in the field of vegetables. Although perhaps not as culturally recognizable as A nightmare on Elm StreetHe showed his ability to predict the pulse of what fans were looking for, an ability that would define his career.
Horror films do not create fear. They release him. – Wes Craven on horror
The 1977 version of The hills have eyes Established a solid base for future projects, although his modest budget prevented him from reaching his full potential. He is sure to say that all these years later, fans can recognize that Craven The hills have eyes is a product of his time. This does not mean that it was not revolutionary for the time, but it did not age as well as some of his other classic works. The bad guys were memorable, yes, but sometimes turned out to be a little campy retrospectively. Like most films, The hills have eyes It was not without his criticism at the time, many finding the rhythm rough. Despite this, Craven’s desire to immerse himself in darker territories with The film has established the basics of a story with the potential to evolve.
Almost 30 years after the beginnings of the original, the remake of Alexandre Aja would take the opportunity to refine these rough edges while remaining faithful to the spirit of the original. Remakes can fail if the appropriate respect for source equipment is not paid. This has afflicted many adaptations of classics, such as the 2019 reimagery of Mary Lambert Senials for petsBased on Stephen King’s novel.
While Lambert’s film had his faults, he managed to capture the dread of Stephen King’s work. The 2019 remake took the cheap path to adjusting intrigue for the shock value to the detriment of the emotional nucleus of history. On the other hand, the remake of The hills have eyes shows what can be accomplished when filmmakers understand how to stay faithful to the original while adding aspects of their own vision.
The 2006 remake was respectful of Wes Craven’s vision
The 1977 version of the hills has market eyes so that its successor can run
Horror fans often approach the term remake with skepticism, because it generally suggests a lack of creativity or a studio that tries to take advantage of a established fans base. The best remakes succeed by honoring the original while enriching its themes and its impact, and Alexandre Aja The hills have eyes Do that. Wes Craven set the frame and Aja developed the Foundation.
Craven’s film shows the public the heartbreaking experience of the Carter family while they find themselves driven by a bunch of brutal cannibals. He overturned the script on the dynamics of the predator and prey, highlighting the fragility of society in the face of extreme violence. The premise is terrifying, but because of time and budget, the real horror of the situation could not be fully achieved.
Alexandre Aja took the bones of Craven’s story and added the horrible texture necessary for Paint the original premise in its complete and brutal scope. The original idea is always very intact, but amplified by a broader budget and the era of extreme horror films in which it was created. As indicated, the beginning in the mid -2000s was a moment for more odious horror representations, and The hills have eyes has capitalized on this.
The Carter family stayed in the center of Aja remake, the characters being a little more developed. This allows the public to connect to the characters, which makes the circumstances terrible with which they are much stronger. Fans were able to fear mutants, but also invested in the potential survival of certain members of the Carter family.
Do The hills have eyes It was a big challenge, yes, but it was also a potentially good remake to do, because it was possible to improve the subject, go further with and do something really extraordinary and different from the original. – Alexandre Aja on the redesign The hills have eyes
Perhaps the most powerful contribution of AJA to remake came in the reimagination of the bad guys. In Craven’s version, the antagonists were described as monstrous residents of the desert, partly based on the legend of Sawney Bean. Sawney Bean is a legendary Scottish figure, which would have led a cannibal clan in the 15th or 16th centuries. Aja moved the dynamics of the villain by explaining that they were victims of nuclear tests during the Cold War, leaving them twisted but also with a hint of tragic past. The bad guys are visually more monstrous and threatening, leading to excessive violence that really puts the disastrous situation of the Carter family in its context.
What makes the remake of 2006 so impressive is that none of these changes betrays the original Craven. If anything, Aja’s additions reinforce Craven’s ideas The hills have eyes. Almost all of AJA’s creative decisions are based on Craven’s frame. Craven had an understanding of what the unstable public, and the remake of Aja simply updates the anxieties of the new millennium. The intense violence of remake, moral complexity and constant tension capture moods that resonated with an audience that was aware of the dangers of unpredictable brutality. In a world filled with bad remakes, the 2006 version of The hills have eyes Show filmmakers how it should be done.
The remake of the hills has the eyes included the original
Wes Craven gave future filmmakers the ingredients
Wes Craven The hills have eyes Supplied a horror plan, rooted in human fear, so that Alexander Aja relies on three decades later. Craven’s original influence is present in the tone of remake. AJA’s film reflects its style of horror signature intertwined with social comments, showing that a large part of the terror is below the surface. Reimagination proves how Relevant horror remains through generations. Fears of the original public are still present, only translated by horror fans in the 2000s.
The 2006 remake of The hills have eyes It remains terrifying while honoring the inheritance of its predecessor, a rare feat for adaptations of the classics. As a rule, reimaginations are too much based on nostalgia or the value of the shock, leaving the audience bored and the film feeling hollow. For many, Aja The hills have eyes is a reference for what a remake should be and what it can accomplish by widening the ideas of the source material.