Keanu Reeves is one of the most loved actors in the modern era. With films like the John Wick franchise brought the public to mass rooms, classics like The matrix And its consequences always taking a major place in cultural zeitgeist, and cult classics as Break And Speed Always running in the minds of the fans, Reeves has maintained a level of super-ins rival in the greatest Hollywood legends.

One of his most underestimated films and a performance that earned him an unjust level of criticism at the time, is the 1992 horror epic by director Francis Ford Coppola, Dracula by Bram Stoker. The film, one of the most amazing practical and technical cinematographic achievements of its decade, remains a feast for the senses thirty-three years later, and despite somewhat mixed criticism at the time, it was difficult for criticisms to maintain that the film was nothing less than in a spectacular way.

Francis Ford Coppola was never afraid to go big

The emblematic director constantly pushes the cinematographic envelope

Director of some of the most loved and emblematic films of all time, Francis Ford Coppola is a Hollywood legend. His contributions to the world of American cinema cannot be overestimated, with films like The godfather,, Part II of the godfatherAnd Apocalypse now All stand out like the final entrances in their respective genres. Many of his films have pushed cinematographic art into new daring directions, and Coppola has never been the type to rest on his laurels. Even with his career extending over more than six decades, each of his films looks like a distinct artistic vision. He never phoned him, and Dracula by Bram Stoker is one of the perfect examples of its dedication to its artisanal and art form.

Although Coppola has managed to create more small-scale and intimate films in the past, like his 1974 film underestimated criminally, The conversationHe has always had a talent for large -scale and explosive cinema. Apocalypse now is one of the most daring and overwhelming pieces of cinema that has ever been put on the screen, and it is a real miracle that the film works as well as. In the same way, Dracula by Bram Stoker One has the impression of being so meticulously designed that, at any time, it could collapse under the weight of its own ambitions. It is a terrifying, daring and overwhelming piece, and the performance of each actor helps to raise work to an even higher extreme.

Each frame of Dracula by Bram Stoker is a work of art. Each second of the time script is full of densely populated images, formidable colors and technically spectacular effects. The beloved cinema critic, Roger Ebert, someone who, in the past, had rejected part of the content of the kind of horror, was apparently completely fascinated by Dracula“S Production design and incredible technical components. In his review of the filmEbert discussed the fact that the technical job was the main draw of the film, despite other aspects that led him.

“The film is an exercise in feverish excess, and for that, if for little, I appreciated it”.

Although there were certainly many viewers of Dracula by Bram Stoker Who agreed with the feeling of Ebert, the idea that the film is devoid of any other aspect or engaging quality sells it short. For example, the narrative impulse, the formidable atmosphere made by music and the main performance, and dedication to source equipment are all incredibly laudable. It may not be the final masterpiece of Coppola, but there remains a great adaptation of the history of Dracula’s history.

Keanu Reeves is actually quite good in the film

Despite the criticisms of his performance, Reeves gives heart and soul to the film

Keanu Reeves is a very specific type of actor. He is not a chameleon like so much of his contemporaries – he is not able to sink into a role in a way that leaves the public completely bought and almost forgetting that they see an actor representing a role. Actors like Jack Nicholson, Daniel Day-Lewis and Gene Hackman disappear in every role they assumeBut Keanu Reeves’ call is different from these artists. Audience as The energy and attitude of Keanu Reeves, and because they love it in real life, they like to see him play the same role again and again on the screen.

John Wick is very similar to Neo. Johnny Utah is very similar to Jack Traven. Almost all the role that Keanu Reeves assumes ends up being (especially) a version of himself. It is this fact that some criticisms and the public sometimes find its bizarre and off -putting performance. Dracula by Bram Stoker is a film which, at first glance, seems to do its best to evoke a certain period and a certain kind from the film. It is a tribute to the classic domain of German expressionism in the film, as well as a simple and true adaptation to the source of the original story of Bram Stoker. While the film certainly East These things are also a very clear attempt to reinterpret history through a modern lens.

Related

Keanu Reeves’ “worst performance” is actually one of his best

Despite the critical backlash, Keanu Reeves was a perfect match for Jonathan Harker in Dracula by Bram Stoker.

The casting of Keanu Reeves and Winona Ryder is not an error. Bring in two of the most sought after and most loved young actors in a story as old and bizarre as Dracula by Bram Stoker is a deliberate choice, and the juxtaposition of the public by seeing all the beautiful practical effects, sets and costumes made with love, and old -fashioned cinematographic practices alongside contemporary Hollywood hearts, Keanu Reeves and Winona Ryder, work brilliantly for the film. Yes, Ryder and Reeves fight somewhat with the dialect and the accents of the time in which their characters exist, but at a fundamental level, they are perfect for their respective roles.

Dracula by Bram Stoker is the best version of the emblematic tale

The film directed with love is the emblematic story of vampires to its best

Alongside Keanu Reeves and Winona Ryder, actor Gary Oldman shines as Dracula holder himself. Oldman’s subtle and almost romantic performance is simultaneously terrifying and reinforced. Its opera performance nature, as well as its physique, really sells the character at a fundamental level, and it allows the public to really buy the complex story of the film. The sexual nature of Dracula and the myth of vampires as a whole has never been effortless that in Dracula by Bram StokerAnd the explosive nature of the production design and the work of the film makes each play a visual delight.

There have been countless adaptations of the legendary Vampire Tale of Bram Stoker, but none has completely captured the essence of the source material in the way in which Coppola’s effort in 1992 did it. More recent adaptations, like Robert Eggers’ Handicapcame to reach the same erotic nature badly, but something on Dracula by Bram Stoker Just feels so timeless without effort. It is so clear that each person involved behind the scenes was entirely dedicated to the adaptation of the source material in a way as loving and as respectful as possible, and despite certain contrary claims, they have absolutely succeeded. Art is sometimes controversial. He can sometimes divide the public in the middle. This is exactly this Dracula by Bram Stoker did. It is not as universally easy to love as something like The godfatherBut it undoubtedly stands alongside the masterpiece of Coppola in 1972 as one of the coolest and most important works in Hollywood cinema in the past fifty-five years.

Related

25 Best Romantic Vampire Films of all time

Vampires and romance have been a concept that has become peer for decades. But from Underworld to the invitation, what films are the best examples?

Keanu Reeves certainly found himself playing in films that his performance style was more in line with the following years Dracula by Bram StokerBut that does not indicate that his work on the 1992 Gothic masterpiece of Coppola failed. On the contrary, Keanu Reeves could well be one of the strengths of the filmBringing a modern advantage and a real feeling of empathetic terror to history – something that is so often lacking in other adaptations of Bram Stoker’s work. Roger Ebert’s assertion that the film is a “Gothic extravagance” could not be more true, and the fact that technical achievements and visual prowess of the film could overcome one of his other shortcomings testify to the capacities of each of the incredible creators behind the production of the film. Dracula by Bram Stoker has become a final work for so many people involved, from Gary Oldman to Winona Ryder to Francis Ford Coppola himself. It is a real miracle that the film exists in the way it does, and its masterful control over each of its many narrative and technical aspects is simply impressive.

Dracula by Bram Stoker

Release date

November 13, 1992

Execution time

127 minutes

Director

Francis Ford Coppola

Writers

Bram Stoker, James V. Hart

• 

• 

  Winona Ryder

  Mina Murray / Elisabeta