You realized the chronological failure that took place in the saga of Superman From Christopher Reeve?

If even an author like Camilo José Cela made the mistake, in 1951, to recover a character who had killed some pages before in his novel The hiveIt should not be surprised that some audiovisual products, especially when it comes to the Longevas series or vast cinematographic Sagamos, make some concordance errors, some of which are much more remarkable than others.

We have a very clear example in the case that concerns us in this article, within which, as you can check if the reading continues until the end, we will focus on one of the failures that has been able to happen more unnoticed in the saga of Superman From Chistopher ReeveWhich is a more fashionable character than ever from the recent premiere of the new superhero film on the big screen.

The actor mentioned in the previous paragraph was responsible for playing the last child of Krypton In movies Superman (1978), Superman II: the adventure continues (1980), Superman III (1983) y Superman IV: looking for peace (1987). Although tetralology loses the bellows while advanced, it is still remembered as one of the great contacts in the world of superhero cinema in general and the alter ego of Clark Kent in particular.

However, what many people forget is that there is a fifth film of the same saga that presented in preview between the third and the quarter of Supermanunder the title Supergirl (1984), with the protagonist Helen SlaterWhich, despite not being the same success as the aforementioned tetralogy, must be taken into consideration for the reasons that we mentioned in the next paragraph.

First you have to keep how much we can see a poster in which we are shown to us Christopher Reeve Emphasized in the red and blue dress, in addition to this it appears Marc McClure give life to Jimmy Olsenas in the other four films, and there is the presence of Maureen Teefy in the role of Lucy Lanewhose image can be seen pursuant to this paragraph, which is precisely the character that interests us to distinguish ourselves in this article.

As it is easy to guess, he is the younger sister of Lois Lanewhose origin, for those who do not know, dates back to the adventure entitled, precisely, Lois Lane’s sister!which is the second cartoon that appears published in the comic Superman Jimmy Olsen’s friend Nº 36 (1959), from the work of Binder Otto y Curt Swanwhose coverage reproduces under this paragraph. Obviously, Lucy Lane It is mainly recognized to be a family of the highly reporter of the Daily planet.

However, before someone thinks they have forgotten the main theme of this article, let’s resume the question to remember that, in the aforementioned film Supergirlwe can verify it Lucy Lane It is found in a student residence, a fact that clashes with the information provided by Lois Lane played by Margot Kidder In the first film of Superman From Chistopher Reevewhile maintaining a conversation with Clark Kent in which he tells him that his sister has two children and a mortgage.

It is clear that these are errors so easy to find in the lasting franchise, as we have already mentioned at the beginning of the article, although in this case it is due to the fact that, in 1978, it is possible that no one knew that, six years later SupergirlIn order not to appear in it a character who would have launched a phrase of little importance pronounced in the original film. In fact, it is necessary to see these films on more than one occasion and be very aware of all the dialogues to create a failure of this caliber.

With the intention of giving the error for the correction, it could be argued that, despite having been previously shot, the events of Supergirl It occurred before those of the first film by SupermanBut this theory is dismantled because in the first film of Christopher Reeve It is when the superhero is announced in public, while it is already a consolidated hero in the film with his cousin.

Although it is not my intention to ruin the vision of these films to the followers of the franchise, there is no doubt that, from now on, when you see one of these two films you will do it with other eyes. And it must be recognized that in a saga that is already quite incredible for itself, it does not help to find a lot of these errors of the plot.