The authors and authors of the comics have published a declaration for the Ministry of Culture on the use of generative AI in art

Him Ministry of Culture has announced his disposition to Look for consent with the cultural sectorwhich is an opportunity to face the right and equally the Challenges raised by artificial generative intelligence. However, so that this dialogue is legitimate, it is essential that The authors and authors are the main interlocutors and not only the great editorial entities.

Key points in defense of creators’ rights

From the cultural sector a series of Essential requests To protect creative work:

• Refusal of the compulsory collective management of licenses No transparency or control. Any system that pretends Impose the use of works without the explicit consent of its authors It is unacceptable.
• Defense of the opt-in modelThat is, the creators must Explicitly authorize The use of the works for the formation of the AI ​​and not vice versa.
• Opposition to the modification of the law on intellectual property To legitimize the practices based on Appropriation of the content without authorization.
• Commitment to a model of dialogue to put the Creative peoplenot for the interests of editorial employer.

The importance of human creation

The sector of comic bookas well as the rest of the cultural industry, It depends on the talent and originality of its creators. IA is nothing without human creativityand any attempt to allow these tools to feed the work of the authors without their consent a direct threat to the very essence of the sector.

The struggle for Rights of creators In the era of artificial intelligence As soon as you start. This call to dialogue must be the first step towards A legal framework that protects creativity and guarantee to Only future for those who make culture possible.

Creators require a true dialogue on artificial intelligence and intellectual property

Him Avocation of artificial intelligence In the creation of content has generated a global debate on The limits between technology and copyright. In case of comic bookThis conflict acquires an even more delicate dimension, since the creative process is deeply personal and visual, something that cannot be replicated without influencing the essence of sequential art itself. The possibility that AIS are trained with pre -existing works without consent requires only an intellectual property, but also Sustainability of artists They depend on their work to live.

Him Use of AI in the generation of comics and illustrations He has caused various answers in the creative community. Some argue that these tools can act as a complement to some technical tasks, but the vast majority refuses its implementation without a clear regulatory framework. A similar case has been seen in the cinema and video game industry, in which the IA has been used for the generation of scenarios and characters, but always under human supervision. However, the danger arises when these technologies They train with content without authorizationallowing large companies to benefit from the talent of others without collecting creators.

Internationally, countries such as the United States and France are already adopting measures to protect original creationwhile the debate begins in Spain. The withdrawal of the royal decree is an initial victory for the creators, but now it is essential that regulations are established that guarantee that the Artificial intelligence does not become a tool for the exploitation of artistic workBut in a regulated resource that respects the rights of those who give life to culture.